login/register

Snip!t from collection of Alan Dix

see all channels for Alan Dix

Snip
summary

Annual Review of Sociology
Vol. 26: 463-496 (Volume publication date August 2000)
(doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.463)
A Space for Place in Sociology
... laces matter for social practices and historical change?

A Space for Place in Sociology - Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1):463 - Abstract
http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146%2Fannurev.soc.26.1.463

Categories

/Channels/cognition and art/space and place

[ go to category ]

For Snip

loading snip actions ...

For Page

loading url actions ...

Annual Review of Sociology
Vol. 26: 463-496 (Volume publication date August 2000)
(doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.463)
A Space for Place in Sociology

Thomas F. Gieryn
Department of Sociology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405; email:

Sociological studies sensitive to the issue of place are rarely labeled thus, and at the same time there are far too many of them to fit in this review. It may be a good thing that this research is seldom gathered up as a “sociology of place,” for that could ghettoize the subject as something of interest only to geographers, architects, or environmental historians. The point of this review is to indicate that sociologists have a stake in place no matter what they analyze, or how: The works cited below emplace inequality, difference, power, politics, interaction, community, social movements, deviance, crime, life course, science, identity, memory, history. After a prologue of definitions and methodological ruminations, I ask: How do places come to be the way they are, and how do places matter for social practices and historical change?

HTML

<span class="seriesTitle">Annual Review of Sociology</span><br> <span class="black9pt"> Vol. 26: 463-496 (Volume publication date August 2000) </span><br> <span class="black9pt">(doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.463)</span><br> <!-- End title of page and review --> <!-- Start full text content --> <div class="articleContent"> <!-- abstract content --><div class="arttitle">A Space for Place in Sociology</div><p class="fulltext"></p><div class="artAuthors"><strong><nobr>Thomas F. Gieryn</nobr> </strong><br><div class="fulltext">Department of Sociology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405; email: <a class="ref email" href="mailto:gieryn@indiana.edu">gieryn@indiana.edu</a></div><br></div><div class="abstractSection"> <p class="first last">Sociological studies sensitive to the issue of place are rarely labeled thus, and at the same time there are far too many of them to fit in this review. It may be a good thing that this research is seldom gathered up as a &#x201c;sociology <i>of</i> place,&#x201d; for that could ghettoize the subject as something of interest only to geographers, architects, or environmental historians. The point of this review is to indicate that sociologists have a stake in place no matter what they analyze, or how: The works cited below <i>emplace</i> inequality, difference, power, politics, interaction, community, social movements, deviance, crime, life course, science, identity, memory, history. After a prologue of definitions and methodological ruminations, I ask: How do places come to be the way they are, and how do places matter for social practices and historical change?</p></div></div>