login/register

Snip!t from collection of Alan Dix

see all channels for Alan Dix

Snip
summary

the court held that the exclusion was not invoked — s... not “a program for a computer … as such.” The UKIP... issued guidance (available here) confirming that:
“Patent examiners should not object to inventions invo ...

English High Court Decision: AI Inventions are Patentable, David Knight
https://briefings.brownrudnick.com/...ourt-decision-ai-inventions-are-patentable

Categories

/Channels/AI

[ go to category ]

/Channels/digital economy

[ go to category ]

For Snip

loading snip actions ...

For Page

loading url actions ...

the court held that the exclusion was not invoked — such an AI system is not “a program for a computer … as such.” The UKIPO has subsequently issued guidance (available here) confirming that:

“Patent examiners should not object to inventions involving ANNs under the ‘program for a computer’ exclusion.”

HTML

<p> the court held that the exclusion was not invoked &#x2014; such an AI system is not &#x201c;a program for a computer &#x2026; as such.&#x201d; The UKIPO has subsequently issued guidance (available <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/examination-of-patent-applications-involving-artificial-neural-networks/examination-of-patent-applications-involving-artificial-neural-networks-ann">here</a>) confirming that:</p><p style="margin-left: 0.5in">&#x201c;Patent examiners should not object to inventions involving ANNs under the &#x2018;program for a computer&#x2019; exclusion.&#x201d;</p>